6/21/2023 0 Comments Grid spark amp![]() ![]() My hope is that with the REW graphs, and those dimensions then together we could identify a better set of drivers. I seem to remember some loudspeaker design software where you could put in the cabinet dimensions, but for the life of me I can't remember the name of that software. The speakers have identical ink-printed markings on the back of the approx. The back reflections from the 4” speakers appear to just rattle around inside the box, and whatever gets reflected into the bass tube determines bass response.There are no other internal ports or baffles.The bass reflex port appears to be a 6” long, 1/8” thick, 1-1/2” ID plastic tube, offset from the flat back wall of the enclosure about 0.5”, and flush mounted to the front speaker baffle.The speaker baffle, also 1/2” thick MDF, has been routed down 1/8” to inset fit the 4” speaker frames.I have not had a chance to tear into mine yet to get the exact cabinet measurements. ![]() The following is from another person on the Spark Amp Mods group. ![]() Can anyone here help me interpret the REW results? I have a UMIK 1 and REW (from an old mini dsp hi-fi setup). My focus is on measuring the speakers, and seeing if we can just drop in some other speakers. There is a pretty good group on facebook called Spark Amp mods where a couple of folks are pulling it apart. The main selling point of the amp is that it is a practice amp that can analyze songs to show you the chords, create a backing track to play against, and has a tone library. ![]() It is not great for bass, but sounds okay for guitar. It is 40 watts, and has two (supposedly frfr) 4 inch speakers. Recently, more and more folks are receiving delivery. It has been in pre-order for a while with only a few being shipped. Positive Grid are selling a small guitar and bass amplified called the Spark. I'm hoping to get some advice from y'all, and to share what I learn with others. I have a little background in DIY audio, but I am still very much a newbie to this. Maybe swapping out the crunchy options for a couple more acoustic models would have made it even more useful, but this remains an appealing six-string multi-tool and a genuine problem-solver for many gigging players.First post here. “The launch of the Acoustasonic Player Telecaster feels like a no-brainer move for Fender, spreading the potential appeal of what is virtually a whole new category of guitar. The feel of the bevelled arm rest and fingerboard edges says quality and comfort this is an inviting guitar and that Modern Deep-C neck will feel familiar to anyone who has played the electric Player series models.” A lovely dark rosewood fingerboard and bridge replaces the US version’s ebony, but that’s not anissue for us. “In terms of feel and build, we honestly can’t find a compromise between this Ensenada-made Player and the US Acoustasonics we’ve tried. MusicRadar: The onboard voice options might have been scaled down but the Acoustasonic Telecaster sticks the landing as a Player Series model, in what could be one of the guitars to make the hybrid build truly go mainstream.įender Player Series Acoustasonic Telecaster: The web says That, in sum, is the sort of thing the Acoustasonic format encourages. That said, it can be pressed into service of many different kinds of styles, perhaps some that are all your own. It is warmer, with a little more width than you’d expect from a Tele’s bridge pickup. Fender promises twang but this isn’t Pete Anderson levels of twang. Park yourself on position one for a more traditional electric guitar experience, but don’t necessarily expect a traditional Telecaster experience. In a sense, this is a sound that almost exists outside of the spectrum of acoustic/electric tones, and is sure to support pedalboard experimentation. The sound is just coming from the piezo and as you turn the blend control it adds drive. Here is where the true hybrid tones are, and as such, there are fewer references for what we are hearing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |